In Chinua Achebe’s published collection  of essays, The Education of a British Protected Child, he narrated a  story told to him by his father, Isaiah Okafor Achebe.
Pa Achebe was a convert to Christianity.  In his zeal to make a disciple of all nations, he approached his  maternal uncle, Pa Udoh, and tried to win his soul for the Lord. The man  refused to be proselytised by his nephew and to make his point, he  pointed to a row of insignia of traditional titles he had taken and  asked his nephew, “What do I do with these?”
Like Chinua, I find the question quite instructive.
The paraphernalia of titles Uncle Udoh  put on display were not just mere items, neither were they a trophy of  his vanities but they were history. His history. The materials were  “culture” and Pa Udoh, from what Achebe described, was an epitome of  Igbo culture and traditional values. Those items he showed his nephew  disembodied the narratives of who he was and the roads he had been. He  could not shed them off to take up a new identity in Jesus Christ  without giving away his entire essence.
The question of “what do I do with this?”  is also a reflective one. It shows foresight. It asks, if I give up who  I am, who I have been and all that defines me, who – or what – do I  become?
The Achebe parable is useful to interpret  Chief Olusegun Obasanjo’s latest act: He recently tore his Peoples  Democratic Party membership card before the very eyes of the world.
Or rather, he handed the card over to a  fawning underling – his ward chairman, one Usman Oladunjoye – to do so  on his behalf as if the indignity of ripping that piece of paper was  beneath his imperious personality.
Obasanjo card-tearing act is not the  beginning of the story –and, perhaps, not a climax of it– although it is  one of the most dramatic moments of the melodrama that has been playing  between the political actors in the PDP for some time now.
Like Achebe’s great uncle, one cannot get  rid of one’s association to one’s history and antecedents without  having to face the question of identity.
One thing to never forget is this:  Obasanjo is the PDP and the PDP is Obasanjo; neither is  indistinguishable from the other. For all the faults of the PDP, one  cannot deny that they are a formidable political party, strong and  resilient. In fact, it is the only party in Nigeria that transcends  personalities, for now. The history of the woes of Nigeria cannot be  narrated without a significant portion attributed to the PDP and the  roles the men that make up its cabals have played in superintending the  denigration of the Nigerian essence.
For the past 16 years, Obasanjo has been a  member of that party and a prominent one at that. There is nothing that  we accuse the PDP of that he does not personify. He has been enabled,  ennobled and obscenely enriched by virtue of his PDP membership. When he  returned from prison in 1998, looking gaunt and haggard from the late  dictator, Gen. Sani Abacha’s hovel, it was the PDP’s political machinery  that rescued him and made a prince out of him.
So, who is Obasanjo without the PDP?
The man gave his reasons for divorcing  himself from the party and all of them were quintessentially Obasanjo in  nature: self-righteous, self-vindicating and zero reflection. But these  should surprise no one. Obasanjo’s narcissism kisses its own reflection  in the mirror. He must simply imagine that the world revolves around  him such that he is always all over the place, heckling and disrupting  everything without acknowledging that the wall crumbling around us was  built from his own pack of cards.
There is no Nigerian – dead, living and  unborn – that can hope to rise to the level of egotism at which the man  operates. Obasanjo even announced his departure from partisan politics  and stated his decision to become a “statesman” as if it was some kind  of career move.
Watching Obasanjo, you would be forgiven  for thinking being a statesman is some kind of job and no longer a  status that is derived from years of noble acts to the nation state.
Now that he is cutting away the insignia  of his PDP titles, who is Obasanjo now? What is he becoming and what  does he do about his past? Does it mean that he is cutting himself loose  from the corruption and odium that the PDP currently represents? If  that is his move, like he wants us to believe, what does he do with  himself considering that some people see him as a repository of all the  values he denounces in the PDP? It is tempting to think of his tearing  ruse as renunciation of the PDP infamy which he embodies but anyone that  knows his antecedents very well will not be blamed for seeing his  card-tearing move as sheer multiplication of his infamy.
What is particularly interesting about  the spectacle of tearing his PDP membership card into pieces – through a  proxy – is the crass drama of it. It would have been wholly sufficient  for the former president to have issued a press release dissociating  himself from the PDP. It would have been unsurprising if the release was  laden with the now familiar menu of Obasanjo-sized nuances that  myopically seek to crucify others for sins he himself is seem not to be  free of. But no, he needed the klieg lights of reporters as witnesses.  Just as he did on the occasions when he wrote a letter to President  Jonathan and then wrote a book dedicated to his self-possession, he had  to turn the whole episode around himself. There seems to be no end to  his cunning.
The video of Obasanjo and Oladunjoye, in  their card-tearing mayhem recalls other incidents -in myths- where the  act of “tearing” was especially significant. Think of the symbolism of  King Saul in the Bible (inadvertently) tearing Samuel’s clothes and  having a curse pronounced on him; the instance of Jesus’ crucifixion and  how the temple cloth was torn from top to bottom. In both instances,  the tearing was the harbinger of a new order. Political actors lost  their gamble, power changed hands and another era began.
So, perhaps one should ask what Obasanjo  “tearing” portends – for him and for the political atmosphere where he  has dominated all these years. Has he sensed a change in Nigeria’s  political misbehaviours and, therefore, jumps ship before a new order  comes and spots him on the wrong divide?
 







 
No comments:
Post a Comment